In an unexpected turn of events, Ernest Kumi, the New Patriotic Party’s (NPP) parliamentary contestant for the Akwatia Constituency, was spotted in Parliament on January 6, 2025, despite being under an injunction issued by the Koforidua High Court.
The injunction, granted in response to a legal challenge by the National Democratic Congress’ (NDC) Henry Boakye-Yiadom, prohibits Mr. Kumi from being sworn in or participating in parliamentary activities pending the resolution of the dispute.
Clerk of Parliament Issues Disclaimer
As parliamentary proceedings unfolded, the Clerk of Parliament reiterated the position of the law, refusing to validate Mr. Kumi’s presence and issuing a formal disclaimer. The Clerk emphasized the illegality of his attendance, further distancing parliamentary processes from Mr. Kumi’s decision to be present.
Reactions from Leadership
The situation prompted responses from both the Majority and Minority leadership: 
- Afenyo-Markin’s Defense: Minority Leader Alexander Afenyo-Markin, speaking on behalf of Mr. Kumi, acknowledged the legal implications and stated that the contestant takes full responsibility for his actions. This statement, interpreted by some as a veiled disclaimer, sparked further debate.
- Dr. Cassiel Ato Forson’s Rebuttal: Majority Leader Dr. Cassiel Ato Forson countered that Mr. Kumi should personally address the issue since he was present in the chamber. Dr. Forson also underscored the breach of the court order, reiterating the importance of adherence to the rule of law.
Minority’s Defiant Stance
In a show of solidarity, the Minority caucus rose in defiance, chanting songs of hope and resilience. Their actions culminated in the popular NPP anthem, “Eshie, rado-rado-rado,” creating a moment of charged political tension on the parliamentary floor.
Proceedings Continue Amid Controversy
Despite the uproar, the Clerk of Parliament maintained the legal position and proceeded with parliamentary affairs, instructing a roll call. Mr. Kumi’s presence was noted, further fueling the debate over his defiance of the injunction.
Legal Background
Ernest Kumi’s injunction stems from a Koforidua High Court ruling, which temporarily restrains him from being sworn in as Member of Parliament for Akwatia. The legal battle arose following allegations of irregularities in the parliamentary election results for the constituency.
Recently, the court awarded GHS 10,000 in costs against Mr. Kumi in favor of Henry Boakye-Yiadom, adding another layer of contention to the ongoing dispute.
Implications for Parliamentary Integrity
Mr. Kumi’s actions raise critical questions about respect for the judiciary and parliamentary integrity. Critics argue that his decision to appear in Parliament despite the injunction undermines the authority of the courts and sets a dangerous precedent.
The controversy highlights the need for stricter adherence to legal processes in Ghana’s democratic institutions and underscores the importance of upholding the rule of law in resolving electoral disputes.
Conclusion
As the 9th Parliament of the Fourth Republic begins its tenure, the incident involving Mr. Ernest Kumi serves as a stark reminder of the challenges facing Ghana’s legislative processes. The outcome of this dispute will likely have lasting implications for the intersection of law and politics in the country.
